EVIDENCE LIBRARY
Large Colonoscopy Database Compared Entonox With a Midazolam-Opioid Regimen
A large sample does not remove treatment-selection differences.
A large sample does not remove treatment-selection differences.
What the supplied source reports
The service evaluation analyzed 18,608 colonoscopies and compared nitrous oxide–oxygen, intravenous midazolam plus opioid, and unmedicated procedures. It considered discomfort, completion to the cecum and polyp detection. Moderate-to-extreme discomfort did not differ significantly between the inhaled and intravenous groups in the reported comparison.
Limits of the evidence
Sedation was not randomly assigned. Patient preference, procedural difficulty and clinical selection can influence both the regimen and apparent comfort. Findings for midazolam plus an opioid do not isolate midazolam’s effect. The large database improves descriptive scope without eliminating confounding.
Implications for expert analysis
For an individual procedure, retain the reason for choosing sedation and the doses of both agents. An unmedicated group’s favorable outcome does not establish that medication worsens comfort. Comparing like clinical circumstances is essential before drawing a causal conclusion from the group averages.
Source and related reading
Source: Publication PMC5605347, read from the supplied PDF. Applications to expert analysis are interpretation.
Related reading: Large-Goiter Case Combined Remimazolam Sedation With Regional Anesthesia.